Thursday, September 12, 2013

About IFRS

IFRS stands for International Financial Reporting Standards and it is a set of principles and rules for reporting various transactions and items in the financial statements.

Just like United States have their US GAAP, Canada has its Canadian GAAP, United Kingdom has its UK GAAP etc, the WORLD will have its world GAAP that is under construction right now. But it’s not called “world GAAP”—it is called IFRS.

Now be careful. Before some time, IFRS was called IAS (International Accounting Standards). Indeed, the first standards carried the name starting with “IAS”, e.g. IAS 1—Presentation of Financial Statements. Exactly 41 standards started with IAS.

But then, IASs were renamed to IFRS. After renaming and rebranding the titles of new standards start with IFRS

Friday, September 6, 2013

IASB UPDATE

The long and winding road: the IASB's project on insurance contracts

On 20 June 2013, the IASB published a revised set of proposals dealing with the accounting for insurance contracts (the ‘revised Exposure Draft’). It will be important to all entities and investors to make sure that they understand the scope of the new proposals, because they may apply to entities that do not consider themselves insurance companies. In addition, investors will want to pay close attention to the way in which the proposed changes will affect reported patterns of profit or loss and the presentation of insurance contract revenue and expenses.

 

Saturday, August 24, 2013

IAS 41- AGRICULTURE

Overview

IAS 41 Agriculture sets out the accounting for agricultural activity – the transformation of biological assets (living plants and animals) into agricultural produce (harvested product of the entity's biological assets). The standard generally requires biological assets to be measured at fair value less costs to sell.
IAS 41 was originally issued in December 2000 and first applied to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2003.

Summary of IAS 41

Objective of IAS 41

The objective of IAS 41 is to establish standards of accounting for agricultural activity – the management of the biological transformation of biological assets (living plants and animals) into agricultural produce (harvested product of the entity's biological assets).

Key definitions

Biological assets: living animals and plants. [IAS 41.5]
Agricultural produce: the harvested product from biological assets. [IAS 41.5]
Costs to sell: incremental costs directly attributable to the disposal of an asset, excluding finance costs and income taxes. [IAS 41.5]

Initial recognition

An entity should recognise a biological asset or agriculture produce only when the entity controls the asset as a result of past events, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity, and the fair value or cost of the asset can be measured reliably. [IAS 41.10]

Measurement

Biological assets should be measured on initial recognition and at subsequent reporting dates at fair value less estimated costs to sell, unless fair value cannot be reliably measured. [IAS 41.12]
Agricultural produce should be measured at fair value less estimated costs to sell at the point of harvest. [IAS 41.13] Because harvested produce is a marketable commodity, there is no 'measurement reliability' exception for produce.
The gain on initial recognition of biological assets at fair value less costs to sell, and changes in fair value less costs to sell of biological assets during a period, are reported in net profit or loss. [IAS 41.26]
A gain on initial recognition of agricultural produce at fair value less costs to sell should be included in net profit or loss for the period in which it arises. [IAS 41.28]
All costs related to biological assets that are measured at fair value are recognised as expenses when incurred, other than costs to purchase biological assets.
IAS 41 presumes that fair value can be reliably measured for most biological assets. However, that presumption can be rebutted for a biological asset that, at the time it is initially recognised in financial statements, does not have a quoted market price in an active market and for which other methods of reasonably estimating fair value are determined to be clearly inappropriate or unworkable. In such a case, the asset is measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. But the entity must still measure all of its other biological assets at fair value less costs to sell. If circumstances change and fair value becomes reliably measurable, a switch to fair value less costs to sell is required. [IAS 41.30]
The following guidance is provided on the measurement of fair value:
  • a quoted market price in an active market for a biological asset or agricultural produce is the most reliable basis for determining the fair value of that asset. If an active market does not exist, IAS 41 provides guidance for choosing another measurement basis. First choice would be a market-determined price such as the most recent market price for that type of asset, or market prices for similar or related assets [IAS 41.17-19]
  • if reliable market-based prices are not available, the present value of expected net cash flows from the asset should be used, discounted at a current market-determined rate [IAS 41.20]
  • in limited circumstances, cost is an indicator of fair value, where little biological transformation has taken place or the impact of biological transformation on price is not expected to be material [IAS 41.24]
  • the fair value of a biological asset is based on current quoted market prices and is not adjusted to reflect the actual price in a binding sale contract that provides for delivery at a future date [IAS 41.16]

Other issues

The change in fair value of biological assets is part physical change (growth, etc.) and part unit price change. Separate disclosure of the two components is encouraged, not required. [IAS 41.51]
Fair value measurement stops at harvest. IAS 2 Inventories applies after harvest. [IAS 41.13]
Agricultural land is accounted for under IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment. However, biological assets that are physically attached to land are measured as biological assets separate from the land. [IAS 41.25]
Intangible assets relating to agricultural activity (for example, milk quotas) are accounted for underIAS 38 Intangible Assets.

Government grants

Unconditional government grants received in respect of biological assets measured at fair value less costs to sell are reported as income when the grant becomes receivable. [IAS 41.34]
If such a grant is conditional (including where the grant requires an entity not to engage in certain agricultural activity), the entity recognises it as income only when the conditions have been met. [IAS 41.35]

Disclosure

Disclosure requirements in IAS 41 include:
  • carrying amount of biological assets [IAS 41.39]
  • description of an entity's biological assets, by broad group [IAS 41.41]
  • change in fair value less costs to sell during the period [IAS 41.40]
  • fair value less costs to sell of agricultural produce harvested during the period [IAS 41.48]
  • description of the nature of an entity's activities with each group of biological assets and non-financial measures or estimates of physical quantities of output during the period and assets on hand at the end of the period [IAS 41.46]
  • information about biological assets whose title is restricted or that are pledged as security [IAS 41.49]
  • commitments for development or acquisition of biological assets [IAS 41.49]
  • financial risk management strategies [IAS 41.49]
  • methods and assumptions for determining fair value [IAS 41.47]
  • reconciliation of changes in the carrying amount of biological assets, showing separately changes in value, purchases, sales, harvesting, business combinations, and foreign exchange differences [IAS 41.50]
Disclosure of a quantified description of each group of biological assets, distinguishing between consumable and bearer assets or between mature and immature assets, is encouraged but not required. [IAS 41.43]
If fair value cannot be measured reliably, additional required disclosures include: [IAS 41.54]
  • description of the assets
  • an explanation of the circumstances
  • if possible, a range within which fair value is highly likely to lie
  • depreciation method
  • useful lives or depreciation rates
  • gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation, beginning and ending
If the fair value of biological assets previously measured at cost now becomes available, certain additional disclosures are required. [IAS 41.56]
Disclosures relating to government grants include the nature and extent of grants, unfulfilled conditions, and significant decreases expected in the level of grants. [IAS 41.58

IAS 40 - INVESTMENT PROPERTY

Overview

IAS 40 Investment Property applies to the accounting for property (land and/or buildings) held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation (or both). Investment properties are initially measured at cost and, with some exceptions. may be subsequently measured using a cost model or fair value model, with changes in the fair value under the fair value model being recognised in profit or loss.
IAS 40 was reissued in December 2003 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005.

Summary of IAS 40

Definition of investment property

Investment property is property (land or a building or part of a building or both) held (by the owner or by the lessee under a finance lease) to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both. [IAS 40.5]
Examples of investment property: [IAS 40.8]
  • land held for long-term capital appreciation
  • land held for undetermined future use
  • building leased out under an operating lease
  • vacant building held to be leased out under an operating lease
  • property that is being constructed or developed for future use as investment property
The following are not investment property and, therefore, are outside the scope of IAS 40: [IAS 40.5 and 40.9]
  • property held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes
  • property held for sale in the ordinary course of business or in the process of construction of development for such sale (IAS 2 Inventories)
  • property being constructed or developed on behalf of third parties (IAS 11 Construction Contracts)
  • owner-occupied property (IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment), including property held for future use as owner-occupied property, property held for future development and subsequent use as owner-occupied property, property occupied by employees and owner-occupied property awaiting disposal
  • property leased to another entity under a finance lease
In May 2008, as part of its Annual Improvements Project, the IASB expanded the scope of IAS 40 to include property under construction or development for future use as an investment property. Such property previously fell within the scope of IAS 16.

Other classification issues

Property held under an operating lease. A property interest that is held by a lessee under an operating lease may be classified and accounted for as investment property provided that: [IAS 40.6]
  • the rest of the definition of investment property is met
  • the operating lease is accounted for as if it were a finance lease in accordance with IAS 17 Leases
  • the lessee uses the fair value model set out in this Standard for the asset recognised
An entity may make the foregoing classification on a property-by-property basis.
Partial own use. If the owner uses part of the property for its own use, and part to earn rentals or for capital appreciation, and the portions can be sold or leased out separately, they are accounted for separately. Therefore the part that is rented out is investment property. If the portions cannot be sold or leased out separately, the property is investment property only if the owner-occupied portion is insignificant. [IAS 40.10]
Ancillary services. If the entity provides ancillary services to the occupants of a property held by the entity, the appropriateness of classification as investment property is determined by the significance of the services provided. If those services are a relatively insignificant component of the arrangement as a whole (for instance, the building owner supplies security and maintenance services to the lessees), then the entity may treat the property as investment property. Where the services provided are more significant (such as in the case of an owner-managed hotel), the property should be classified as owner-occupied. [IAS 40.13]
Intracompany rentals. Property rented to a parent, subsidiary, or fellow subsidiary is not investment property in consolidated financial statements that include both the lessor and the lessee, because the property is owner-occupied from the perspective of the group. However, such property could qualify as investment property in the separate financial statements of the lessor, if the definition of investment property is otherwise met. [IAS 40.15]

Recognition

Investment property should be recognised as an asset when it is probable that the future economic benefits that are associated with the property will flow to the entity, and the cost of the property can be reliably measured. [IAS 40.16]

Initial measurement

Investment property is initially measured at cost, including transaction costs. Such cost should not include start-up costs, abnormal waste, or initial operating losses incurred before the investment property achieves the planned level of occupancy. [IAS 40.20 and 40.23]

Measurement subsequent to initial recognition

IAS 40 permits entities to choose between: [IAS 40.30]
  • a fair value model, and
  • a cost model.
One method must be adopted for all of an entity's investment property. Change is permitted only if this results in a more appropriate presentation. IAS 40 notes that this is highly unlikely for a change from a fair value model to a cost model.

Fair value model

Investment property is remeasured at fair value, which is the amount for which the property could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction. [IAS 40.5] Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of investment property must be included in net profit or loss for the period in which it arises. [IAS 40.35]
Fair value should reflect the actual market state and circumstances as of the balance sheet date. [IAS 40.38] The best evidence of fair value is normally given by current prices on an active market for similar property in the same location and condition and subject to similar lease and other contracts. [IAS 40.45] In the absence of such information, the entity may consider current prices for properties of a different nature or subject to different conditions, recent prices on less active markets with adjustments to reflect changes in economic conditions, and discounted cash flow projections based on reliable estimates of future cash flows. [IAS 40.46]
There is a rebuttable presumption that the entity will be able to determine the fair value of an investment property reliably on a continuing basis. However: [IAS 40.53]
  • If an entity determines that the fair value of an investment property under construction is not reliably determinable but expects the fair value of the property to be reliably determinable when construction is complete, it measures that investment property under construction at cost until either its fair value becomes reliably determinable or construction is completed.
  • If an entity determines that the fair value of an investment property (other than an investment property under construction) is not reliably determinable on a continuing basis, the entity shall measure that investment property using the cost model in IAS 16. The residual value of the investment property shall be assumed to be zero. The entity shall apply IAS 16 until disposal of the investment property.
Where a property has previously been measured at fair value, it should continue to be measured at fair value until disposal, even if comparable market transactions become less frequent or market prices become less readily available. [IAS 40.55]

Cost model

After initial recognition, investment property is accounted for in accordance with the cost model as set out in IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment – cost less accumulated depreciation and less accumulated impairment losses. [IAS 40.56]

Transfers to or from investment property classification

Transfers to, or from, investment property should only be made when there is a change in use, evidenced by one or more of the following: [IAS 40.57]
  • commencement of owner-occupation (transfer from investment property to owner-occupied property)
  • commencement of development with a view to sale (transfer from investment property to inventories)
  • end of owner-occupation (transfer from owner-occupied property to investment property)
  • commencement of an operating lease to another party (transfer from inventories to investment property)
  • end of construction or development (transfer from property in the course of construction/development to investment property
When an entity decides to sell an investment property without development, the property is not reclassified as investment property but is dealt with as investment property until it is disposed of. [IAS 40.58]
The following rules apply for accounting for transfers between categories:
  • for a transfer from investment property carried at fair value to owner-occupied property or inventories, the fair value at the change of use is the 'cost' of the property under its new classification [IAS 40.60]
  • for a transfer from owner-occupied property to investment property carried at fair value, IAS 16 should be applied up to the date of reclassification. Any difference arising between the carrying amount under IAS 16 at that date and the fair value is dealt with as a revaluation under IAS 16 [IAS 40.61]
  • for a transfer from inventories to investment property at fair value, any difference between the fair value at the date of transfer and it previous carrying amount should be recognised in profit or loss [IAS 40.63]
  • when an entity completes construction/development of an investment property that will be carried at fair value, any difference between the fair value at the date of transfer and the previous carrying amount should be recognised in profit or loss. [IAS 40.65]
When an entity uses the cost model for investment property, transfers between categories do not change the carrying amount of the property transferred, and they do not change the cost of the property for measurement or disclosure purposes.

Disposal

An investment property should be derecognised on disposal or when the investment property is permanently withdrawn from use and no future economic benefits are expected from its disposal. The gain or loss on disposal should be calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and should be recognised as income or expense in the income statement. [IAS 40.66 and 40.69] Compensation from third parties is recognised when it becomes receivable. [IAS 40.72]

Disclosure

Both Fair Value Model and Cost Model [IAS 40.75]
  • whether the fair value or the cost model is used
  • if the fair value model is used, whether property interests held under operating leases are classified and accounted for as investment property
  • if classification is difficult, the criteria to distinguish investment property from owner-occupied property and from property held for sale
  • the methods and significant assumptions applied in determining the fair value of investment property
  • the extent to which the fair value of investment property is based on a valuation by a qualified independent valuer; if there has been no such valuation, that fact must be disclosed
  • the amounts recognised in profit or loss for:
    • rental income from investment property
    • direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance) arising from investment property that generated rental income during the period
    • direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance) arising from investment property that did not generate rental income during the period
    • the cumulative change in fair value recognised in profit or loss on a sale from a pool of assets in which the cost model is used into a pool in which the fair value model is used
  • restrictions on the realisability of investment property or the remittance of income and proceeds of disposal
  • contractual obligations to purchase, construct, or develop investment property or for repairs, maintenance or enhancements
Additional Disclosures for the Fair Value Model [IAS 40.76]
  • a reconciliation between the carrying amounts of investment property at the beginning and end of the period, showing additions, disposals, fair value adjustments, net foreign exchange differences, transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property, and other changes [IAS 40.76]
  • significant adjustments to an outside valuation (if any) [IAS 40.77]
  • if an entity that otherwise uses the fair value model measures an item of investment property using the cost model, certain additional disclosures are required [IAS 40.78]
Additional Disclosures for the Cost Model [IAS 40.79]
  • the depreciation methods used
  • the useful lives or the depreciation rates used
  • the gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation (aggregated with accumulated impairment losses) at the beginning and end of the period
  • a reconciliation of the carrying amount of investment property at the beginning and end of the period, showing additions, disposals, depreciation, impairment recognised or reversed, foreign exchange differences, transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property, and other changes
  • the fair value of investment property. If the fair value of an item of investment property cannot be measured reliably, additional disclosures are required, including, if possible, the range of estimates within which fair value is highly likely to lie

IAS 38 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Overview

IAS 38 Intangible Assets outlines the accounting requirements for intangible assets, which are non-monetary assets which are without physical substance and identifiable (either being separable or arising from contractual or other legal rights). Intangible assets meeting the relevant recognition criteria are initially measured at cost, subsequently measured at cost or using the revaluation model, and amortised on a systematic basis over their useful lives (unless the asset has an indefinite useful life, in which case it is not amortised).
IAS 38 was revised in March 2004 and applies to intangible assets acquired in business combinations occurring on or after 31 March 2004, or otherwise to other intangible assets for annual periods beginning on or after 31 March 2004.

Summary of IAS 38

Objective

The objective of IAS 38 is to prescribe the accounting treatment for intangible assets that are not dealt with specifically in another IFRS. The Standard requires an entity to recognise an intangible asset if, and only if, certain criteria are met. The Standard also specifies how to measure the carrying amount of intangible assets and requires certain disclosures regarding intangible assets. [IAS 38.1]

Scope

IAS 38 applies to all intangible assets other than: [IAS 38.2-3]
  • financial assets
  • exploration and evaluation assets (extractive industries)
  • expenditure on the development and extraction of minerals, oil, natural gas, and similar resources
  • intangible assets arising from insurance contracts issued by insurance companies
  • intangible assets covered by another IFRS, such as intangibles held for sale, deferred tax assets, lease assets, assets arising from employee benefits, and goodwill. Goodwill is covered by IFRS 3.

Key definitions

Intangible asset: an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance. An asset is a resource that is controlled by the entity as a result of past events (for example, purchase or self-creation) and from which future economic benefits (inflows of cash or other assets) are expected. [IAS 38.8] Thus, the three critical attributes of an intangible asset are:
  • identifiability
  • control (power to obtain benefits from the asset)
  • future economic benefits (such as revenues or reduced future costs)
Identifiability: an intangible asset is identifiable when it: [IAS 38.12]
  • is separable (capable of being separated and sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, either individually or together with a related contract) or
  • arises from contractual or other legal rights, regardless of whether those rights are transferable or separable from the entity or from other rights and obligations.
Examples of possible intangible assets include:
  • computer software
  • patents
  • copyrights
  • motion picture films
  • customer lists
  • mortgage servicing rights
  • licenses
  • import quotas
  • franchises
  • customer and supplier relationships
  • marketing rights
Intangibles can be acquired:
  • by separate purchase
  • as part of a business combination
  • by a government grant
  • by exchange of assets
  • by self-creation (internal generation)

Recognition

Recognition criteria. IAS 38 requires an entity to recognise an intangible asset, whether purchased or self-created (at cost) if, and only if: [IAS 38.21]
  • it is probable that the future economic benefits that are attributable to the asset will flow to the entity; and
  • the cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
This requirement applies whether an intangible asset is acquired externally or generated internally. IAS 38 includes additional recognition criteria for internally generated intangible assets (see below).
The probability of future economic benefits must be based on reasonable and supportable assumptions about conditions that will exist over the life of the asset. [IAS 38.22] The probability recognition criterion is always considered to be satisfied for intangible assets that are acquired separately or in a business combination. [IAS 38.33]
If recognition criteria not met. If an intangible item does not meet both the definition of and the criteria for recognition as an intangible asset, IAS 38 requires the expenditure on this item to be recognised as an expense when it is incurred. [IAS 38.68]
Business combinations. There is a presumption that the fair value (and therefore the cost) of an intangible asset acquired in a business combination can be measured reliably. [IAS 38.35] An expenditure (included in the cost of acquisition) on an intangible item that does not meet both the definition of and recognition criteria for an intangible asset should form part of the amount attributed to the goodwill recognised at the acquisition date.
Reinstatement. The Standard also prohibits an entity from subsequently reinstating as an intangible asset, at a later date, an expenditure that was originally charged to expense. [IAS 38.71]

Initial recognition: research and development costs

  • Charge all research cost to expense. [IAS 38.54]
  • Development costs are capitalised only after technical and commercial feasibility of the asset for sale or use have been established. This means that the entity must intend and be able to complete the intangible asset and either use it or sell it and be able to demonstrate how the asset will generate future economic benefits. [IAS 38.57]
If an entity cannot distinguish the research phase of an internal project to create an intangible asset from the development phase, the entity treats the expenditure for that project as if it were incurred in the research phase only.

Initial recognition: in-process research and development acquired in a business combination

A research and development project acquired in a business combination is recognised as an asset at cost, even if a component is research. Subsequent expenditure on that project is accounted for as any other research and development cost (expensed except to the extent that the expenditure satisfies the criteria in IAS 38 for recognising such expenditure as an intangible asset). [IAS 38.34]

Initial recognition: internally generated brands, mastheads, titles, lists

Brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and items similar in substance that are internally generated should not be recognised as assets. [IAS 38.63]

Initial recognition: computer software

  • Purchased: capitalise
  • Operating system for hardware: include in hardware cost
  • Internally developed (whether for use or sale): charge to expense until technological feasibility, probable future benefits, intent and ability to use or sell the software, resources to complete the software, and ability to measure cost.
  • Amortisation: over useful life, based on pattern of benefits (straight-line is the default).

Initial recognition: certain other defined types of costs

The following items must be charged to expense when incurred:
  • internally generated goodwill [IAS 38.48]
  • start-up, pre-opening, and pre-operating costs [IAS 38.69]
  • training cost [IAS 38.69]
  • advertising and promotional cost, including mail order catalogues [IAS 38.69]
  • relocation costs [IAS 38.69]
For this purpose, 'when incurred' means when the entity receives the related goods or services. If the entity has made a prepayment for the above items, that prepayment is recognised as an asset until the entity receives the related goods or services. [IAS 38.70]

Initial measurement

Intangible assets are initially measured at cost. [IAS 38.24]

Measurement subsequent to acquisition: cost model and revaluation models allowed

An entity must choose either the cost model or the revaluation model for each class of intangible asset. [IAS 38.72]
Cost model. After initial recognition the benchmark treatment is that intangible assets should be carried at cost less any amortisation and impairment losses. [IAS 38.74]
Revaluation model. Intangible assets may be carried at a revalued amount (based on fair value) less any subsequent amortisation and impairment losses only if fair value can be determined by reference to an active market. [IAS 38.75] Such active markets are expected to be uncommon for intangible assets. [IAS 38.78] Examples where they might exist:
  • production quotas
  • fishing licences
  • taxi licences
Under the revaluation model, revaluation increases are credited directly to "revaluation surplus" within equity except to the extent that it reverses a revaluation decrease previously recognised in profit and loss. If the revalued intangible has a finite life and is, therefore, being amortised (see below) the revalued amount is amortised. [IAS 38.85]

Classification of intangible assets based on useful life

Intangible assets are classified as: [IAS 38.88]
  • Indefinite life: no foreseeable limit to the period over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows for the entity.
  • Finite life: a limited period of benefit to the entity.

Measurement subsequent to acquisition: intangible assets with finite lives

The cost less residual value of an intangible asset with a finite useful life should be amortised on a systematic basis over that life: [IAS 38.97]
  • The amortisation method should reflect the pattern of benefits.
  • If the pattern cannot be determined reliably, amortise by the straight line method.
  • The amortisation charge is recognised in profit or loss unless another IFRS requires that it be included in the cost of another asset.
  • The amortisation period should be reviewed at least annually. [IAS 38.104]
The asset should also be assessed for impairment in accordance with IAS 36. [IAS 38.111]

Measurement subsequent to acquisition: intangible assets with indefinite useful lives

An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life should not be amortised. [IAS 38.107]
Its useful life should be reviewed each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life assessment for that asset. If they do not, the change in the useful life assessment from indefinite to finite should be accounted for as a change in an accounting estimate. [IAS 38.109]
The asset should also be assessed for impairment in accordance with IAS 36. [IAS 38.111]

Subsequent expenditure

Subsequent expenditure on an intangible asset after its purchase or completion should be recognised as an expense when it is incurred, unless it is probable that this expenditure will enable the asset to generate future economic benefits in excess of its originally assessed standard of performance and the expenditure can be measured and attributed to the asset reliably. [IAS 38.60]

Disclosure

For each class of intangible asset, disclose: [IAS 38.118 and 38.122]
  • useful life or amortisation rate
  • amortisation method
  • gross carrying amount
  • accumulated amortisation and impairment losses
  • line items in the income statement in which amortisation is included
  • reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and the end of the period showing:
    • additions (business combinations separately)
    • assets held for sale
    • retirements and other disposals
    • revaluations
    • impairments
    • reversals of impairments
    • amortisation
    • foreign exchange differences
    • other changes
  • basis for determining that an intangible has an indefinite life
  • description and carrying amount of individually material intangible assets
  • certain special disclosures about intangible assets acquired by way of government grants
  • information about intangible assets whose title is restricted
  • contractual commitments to acquire intangible assets
Additional disclosures are required about:
  • intangible assets carried at revalued amounts [IAS 38.124]
  • the amount of research and development expenditure recognised as an expense in the current period [IAS 38.126]